Week 4

For today, we split 2 tasks amongst ourselves: One group proceeded to do the post-practical questions while the other group studied the COWS matrix and utilized Materials for Design (MFD) to choose the best material for a teat and cover of a milk bottle respectively.

 

For the post-practical questions, we were assigned a list of questions that investigated the experiment we did the week before in further detail. Questions 1-2 required us to understand the working principles and mechanism of the coffee makerQuestion 3 contained our tabulated results; Questions 4-5 required calculations on the energy usage of the coffee machine; and Questions 6-8 asked on how we could improve on the coffee machine and our assumptions and errors. Everything went relatively smoothly, and we finished answering the questions within an hour. 


These are the COWS matrix for the teat. 

For the teat: 

Function  

The baby will drink the milk from the teat. 

Constraints  

Non-reactive to milk ingredients 

Flexible 

Non-toxic 

Soft 

Objective 

Maximizing softness and flexibility. 

 

We had to find these 3 pieces of information first to narrow down our search of the suitable material, if not we would have a lot of random materials that would not work like stainless steel for a teat. 

 

Material candidates: Natural rubber latex, Silicone and ethylene propylene rubber 

Criteria 

Weightage (%) 

                                        Options 

Nitrile Rubber 

Silicone Rubber 

ethylene propylene rubber 

 Hardness (Shore A) 

 

30 

30-90 

Score:4 

4x30%=120% 

1-95 

Score:5 

5x30%=150% 

30-95 

Score:4 

4x30%=120% 

Flexibility 

30 

0.004 GPa 

Score:5 

5x30%=150% 

 

0.001-0.05 GPa 

Score:5 

5x30%=150% 

 

 

0.006 GPa 

Score:5 

5x30%=150% 

 

 

Non-reactive to milk ingredients 

20 

5=Excellent 

20%x5=100% 

5=Excellent 

20%x5=100% 

4=Very good 

20%x5=100% 

Non-toxic  

20 

3=Good 

3x20%=60% 

5=Excellent 

20%x5=100 

5= Excellent 

20%x5=100 

Total 

100 

430% 

500% 

470% 

 

These conditions favoured polyesters, so our options were all polyesters, these ratings are based on a 1 to 5 scale and the weightage is decided based on how important this factor is for the material to complete its task and it must total up to 100%. The score then gets multiplied by the weightage for that section and each section is added up to achieve the total score of each material. The cost and ease of manufacturing is then considered. 

 

Criteria 

Weightage (%) 

Options 

Nitrile Rubber 

 

Silicone Rubber 

 

 

ethylene propylene rubber 

 

Cost of material 

70 

Expensive 

Score: 1 

1x70%=70% 

Cheapest 

Score:5 

5x70%=350% 

Cheap 

Score:4 

4x70%=280% 

Ease of handling/ manufacturing 

 

30 

Very good 

Score:4 

30x30%=90% 

 

Very good 

Score:4 

30x30%=90% 

 

Very good 

Score:4 

30x30%=90% 

 

Total 

 

100% 

160% 

440% 

370% 

 

The same methodology is used and the score is decided. Based on these 2 tables we have decided the most suitable material is the silicone rubber. 

We were also tasked to find a material for the cover of the baby bottle. These are the tables we have come up with. 

 

For the cover: 

Function 

To hold the teat and screw onto the top of the bottle to keep liquids inside 

Constraints 

Non-corrosive 

Non-reactive 

Hard  

Non-toxic 

Objective 

Hold liquids in and be resistant to drops 

 

Based on the description above, the material should be hard and tough with the requirement of being able to handle temperatures above 37°C. Ceramics will be discarded as a choice here as they are easy to break. Material candidates: Stainless steel, Makrolon WB1239 polycarbonate, Polypropylene. 

Criteria 

Weightage (%) 

Options 

Stainless steel 304 

Makrolon WB1239 polycarbonate 

Polypropylene 

Hardness 

60 

215MPa 

Score:5 

64.0MPa 

Score: 4 

31.6MPa 

Score: 3 

Non-reactive to milk ingredients 

 

20 

5 = Excellent 

5 = Excellent 

 

5 = Excellent 

 

Non-corrosive 

 

20 

5 = Excellent 

 

5 = Excellent 

 

5 = Excellent 

 

Total 

100 

500 

440 

380 

 

Criteria 

Weightage (%) 

Options 

Stainless steel 304 

Makrolon WB1239 polycarbonate 

 

Cost of material 

70 

More expensive: 4 

Less expensive: 5 

Ease of handling/ manufacturing 

 

30 

Easier to manufacture: 5 

Harder to manufacture: 3 

Total 

 

100 

430 

440 

 

With the scores we have decided that stainless steel 304 is the best material for a cover of the baby bottle. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

WELCOME!

Welcome to our blog! We are a team of 4 students from Singapore Polytechnic taking Diploma in Chemical Engineering. Our names are Firmanshah...